new-fangled England vs. Chesapeake DBQ
By: Andrew Ferry
Although the modernistic England and Chesapeake theatrical roles were both settled largely by spate of English origin, by 1700 the two had evolved into two distinct societies. darn it would be impossible to explain each of the thousands of reasons for this change in development, there were many important factors whose effectuate can be easily seen and are easily understood. Some of these factors were social or economic, while others stemmed from the environment and location of the colonies. This essay allow for illustrate some of these factors, and attempt to show how their individual effects came together and helped turn the New England and Chesapeake regions into separate, distinct societies.
New England during colonial clock was a growing system of small towns, isolated farmlands, and bustle port cities. The amount of various social kneads throughout the region would have been tremendous, but a very major influence was the type of person who settled here. While there were certainly many different types of settlers in New England around the seventeenth and 18th centuries, a good deal of the early New England settlers consisted of Puritan families. When examining Document B, a shipping manifest of emigrants ensnare for New England, one can see that the list is calm almost exclusively of families.
Early New Englanders believed that God positive the family for human benefit; they saw the family as a joyride to help men and women resist temptation that they would otherwise submit to. The New Englanders concern over the Godly Family played a prominent role in shaping their society as a whole. Unlike most settlers moving to the Chesapeake region, most New Englanders moved in established family units. This allowed them to preserve English traditions and queue up more quickly than the Chesapeake settlers, who...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment