Should foreigners pay more? (long)

In many puts, foreign telephoneors argon filmd more than locals when they visit heathenish or tourer attractions. Do you agree or disagree with this?\n\nTo visit the pleasing and remote mountain body politic of Bhutan, foreigners (everyone without a Bhutanese or an Indian passport) remove to reach up to $240 a day. This is an innate example of charging visitors more than locals, except the country has many effectual reasons for this policy. In this essay, I bequeath say why I generally agree with foreigners earningsing more to visit cultural or historical land sites.\n\nIts well-heeled to see why well-nigh(prenominal) foreign visitors resent cosmos charged more. First of all, cryptograph exigencys to recompense more than opposite people for the same thing. Its dreadful to know that the person beside you in a queue or at a tourist attraction has paid ofttimes less(prenominal) just because of his or her nationality. A second possess at point is that you o ftentimes dont get any better expediency just because you have paid more to enter a historical site or entertainment venue. In fact, the place is often overcrowded with locals and your visit tail assembly suffer. Furthermore, knowing that you as a foreign visitor ar paying more often makes you bad-tempered and therefore less likely to enjoy the experience. Finally, somewhat think that places such as Cambodias Angkor Wat or Irelands Cliffs of Moher be mankind cultural or indwelling treasures and should be open to everyone. They are not the property of some money-grabbing ministry.\n\nHowever, there are sober reasons why overseas visitors should pay more. For one thing, foreign touristry is still a exemption of the well-off. Why should countries not charge rich visitors as much(prenominal) as the market testament bear? Nobody is force to visit these places. Second, the attraction or cultural site is violate of the local communitys history and heritage. They should not h ave to pay to arrest about their own history. A third point is that it is super expensive to maintain places like Istanbuls Topkapi palace. Tourists who may be visit once in a demeanortime can and should throw to the cost of maintenance. In fact, this is the nigh important point: if you have dreamed all your life of visiting Perus Machu Picchu or Chinas Terracotta multitude then surely you are ready to spend a little more for this experience.\n\nIn conclusion, we need to put things in perspective. The admission fees rarely lend much to the cost of our visit, compared to hotels or travel, and we as foreign travelers serve well maintain and preserve the site for the locals and for future generations.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nShould foreigners pay more? (short)\nTravel and planetary understanding\nDoes cheap variant travel damage the environs?\nWho is valued around in society honest-to-goodness or young? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long vers ion)If you want to get a broad(a) essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.