Leasership and Social Organization in Europe Essay

In Europe, most of the field of study used one main kindly social system. This is represented in my graduation pyramid. As you can see the kings are the most powerful, next manage the nobles, then the knights, and finally the peasants. The box that has the word church in it to the look means that they had as much power as the kings and nobles. This society was base on the feudal system. It was mainly constructed for one reason, which was security. It was possible for everyone to move high up the ranks of the pyramid. This is what most people aspired to do. England had a different social structure than this. It was made up of nobility at the top, next came the knights, then the largest come apart of population, the villanis, and finally the lowest class, the bordars.The two social structures were alike because they both had to do with the process of giving and keeping pieces of land to workers. The nobility played a big role in both social structures too. In the posthumous m iddle ages, they wanted to centralize power so they expanded august domain, set up systems of royal justice, organized government bureaucracies, built stand up armies, and developed tax systems. This was very beneficial to Europe. These particular systems were probably in place because they were simple and easy to follow. In my opinion, I think that these social structures did work for Europe and England. I dont think it could receive been changed any better because it was already very organized and clear. Without these social structures, gallant Europe would not have been the same.BiographySocial Structure in Medieval Europe. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. .The Feudal Structure of the Medieval World. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. . feudalism Pyramid. Middle Ages. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. .Medieval English Society. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. .Ellis, Elisabeth Gaynor., Anthony Esler, and Burton F. Beers. Prentice dormitoryWorld History. Upper Saddle River, NJ Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007. Print.