Environmental Case Analysis Essay

The human face tells to the highest degree the current crisis in the cutting England angleeries, which recorded the devastation in the ocean ecosystem due to over leaning in that part of the globe. The disco real of the George Bank or St. Georges Shoal in the northern pole surrounded by the Newfoundland and Labrador in 1821 paved the opportunity for the fishing industry by the Gloucesters fleet since then (p. 42) until groups of fishermen used the area in 1950 from different countries such as the Russians, Germans, Poles, and Spanish (p.44). It is said that the raw vessels using modern facilities in fishing used by the latter fishermen had triggered the extinction of the many an(prenominal) kinds of fishes in the sea. Today, it is documented that naughty stock of living organisms that includes the ocean pabulum web have decreased in a very alarming level. The twentieth century fishing left the marine resources at stake with a newspaper of sixteen percent decrease per yea r, with a total loss of about ninety percent of predatory fishes (p. 37).The George Bank, which was previously overpopulated with living organisms, had malignd considerably enough to call the attention of the authorities as well up as the stakeholders to act upon the tragic loss. It is recorded that the Gloucesters fleet and smaller craft in 1859 had brought in 60,000 barrels of mackerel, 11,400,000 pounds of codfish, and 4,590,000 pounds of halibut, and few one million million of different species (p. 42). Since 1970s, the dec occupation began spontaneously with record of about 4. 4 million tons of fish in 1973 to 2.6 millions of tons in 1992 is an indication that ecosystem in the bank is acquiring impoverished. Variety of fishes may face extinction which range from predators or species of higher tropic level such as tuna and halibut to species of lower tropic level such plankton-eaters such as anchovies and cod. The lather is, since the main predators as well as the codfish and haddock are facing annihilation, the dogfish and glide may dominate George Bank, and that will cause ecological shift (p. 46).Because of this, the market has changed its demand for dogfish and glide (ibid). Thus, many concerned individual and groups take into account the crisis and proposed recommendation to revive the sea. For instance, the East Coast Fisheries league executive director James OMalley suggested the 50% effort reduction to replenish the stock of fish in the bank (p. 48). This job concerns the many stakeholders particularly the people who are dependent on fish for fare such as in the case of people of Europe and America.Likewise, if the fifty reduction or other proposals such as the buyout scheme or fish farming may also legal injury the fishermen for their bread and butter is fishing. This will also harm the fishing industry. There will be incessant battle between the opposing pursuals of government and business groups, which includes global fisheries, fo r both attend to their own interests. No matter what, if the problem will not be settled, strap scenario may come about damage in the ocean ecosystem and extinction of fishes which is vital to human survival.Relationship to Science and Ethics The sustainability of the marine viands web lies greatly on reducing fishing capacity until such time that oceans reach inhibit level. In connection, when fishing activity is reduced, the serial depletions or erupt of species will gradually reduce and frankincense improves the condition in the ecosystem. This will provide sufficiency for all the people who need sea foods for survival. In this endeavor, people are to work hard hand in hand to increase the sustainability of oceans in providing food that people need.Without reducing in fishing will affect the ecosystems of the fishes and other living organisms in the wet because those involve in the marine food web are important and interconnected in the chain. For instance, the predators th ough serve a negative impact on their stone pit yet, provide help in the economy of the prey in such a way that they also consume other predators and competitors so the prey will abound and will become available for humans (Pauly, Christensen, Guenette, Pitcher, Sumaila, Watson, & Zeller). Thus, their extinction may lead to worst condition to prey.In addition, according to Pauly, et. al. , there will be reduction in the number and length of pathways linking food fishes to the primary producers that results to fluctuations in the population of the prey. Thus, the issue of overexploitation done by people to the marine conduct is a threat to human consumption that without appropriate and immediate accomplishment, people will greatly suffer. The ethics that must be seen in this case is the interest that governs every action. Whose interest should prevail the interest of majority or the interest of few for money?Either of the interest will determine the action that will be made. Wh at persuades us the value of preserving the New England fisheries? The above alarming scenario in the marine life is enough to consider steps towards reducing fishing around the area. Stakeholders must cooperate with each other towards the economy of the remaining life in the ocean for the benefit of many more people. Above many reasons, the preservation of marine life through fishing reduction will ensure the future of the food supply.Definitely, if fishing continues, none will be left for humans for there will be no chance for these species to survive. The demand for immediate action is great that international cooperation is deemed important. The process may take some(prenominal) years before full the recovery, yet the impact is lasting for mens survival. Preservation of New England Aquatic ecosystem is another reason for this. Even politicians and government leaders and even ordinary fishermen have taken for granted the ill effect of overfishing because they all thought that ocean will yield what we need (Pauly, et. al). state never realize that as human population increases, the water resources decrease to supply the demand for food. Thus, the preservation of ecosystem could sustain the healthy economy of the country because biological resources are sufficient to supply ecological needs. How does it continue that it is in no ones interest to observe the fisheries but it is everyones interest to preserve the fishery? At this point in time, though there are studies conducted on the serious problem with aquatic life, people often neglect their responsibility because they have a negative attitude about the problem.The fishermen understand the problem but they resist doing positive action, rather, they are against limits, against collectivization and consolidation, against being regulated, reformed, and brought in line with the common good for the long run (p. 52). This particular problem will lead to total collapse of the ocean ecosystem that affects ev ery individual. Well, preservation of fishery is everyones business. This must be understood by every stakeholder especially the fishermen.The efforts by the civic groups and the government must also direct to these individual by reeducating them of the unbowed intention of the action.ReferencePauly, D. , Christensen, V. , Guenette, S. , Pitcher, T. , Sumaila, R. , Watson, W. , & Zeller, D. (2002). Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature International Weekly Journal of Science, 418 (689-695). http//www. nature. com/nature/ daybook/v418/n6898/full/nature01017. html Skunked. Crisis in the New England Fisheries (file attachment)