The movie rating system should be revised Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The word picture grade placement should be revised - Essay ExampleHowever, the rating system is not viewed as an effective and authentic body and has been criticized for a variety of reasons.The first criticism against the motion picture rating system has been presented by film critic Ebert who claims the rating system to place more importance on the minute lucubrate of the moving-picture show rather than the movie itself. This argument stands against the systems choice of picking on intricate details of the movie like the number of times a profane word is used or the number of scenes containing violence. This allows the rating system to escape from the throes of presenting the true message of the movie. For instance, a movie with sex and violence could be discussing the consequences these activities could nurture to the audience. Adult ratings should be limited to those movies which show an immense degree of sex and violence. This would help in the removal of NC-17 which all ows a greater number to access a variety of movies. Ratings of movies like Passion of the Christ should not have ratings that limit individuals under 17 from watching a movie (Ebert 2004). This is because the rating system creates a loss in the true message of the movie in its quest to censor the confine.Another theme that stands up against movie rating systems is the belief that filmmakers are forced to change movies because the content affects the face-to-face sensibilities of the members of the censorship board. Farber, a film critic talks of how filmmakers were threatened with an X rating to make them remove content which offended the board members (1972). This is seen as biased behavior on the part of the rating systems board because of their unfitness to provide a decision based solely on the judgment of creating a rating that testament be friendly to the audience. Instead, the board is apt on creating ratings that will inadvertently be influenced by their personal beliefs and opinions.Another idea that talks of the flaws in the rating system is the lack of globe opinion that is involved. on that point is a call by both conservative and liberal parties to make the rating systems methods and techniques more public thus allowing a degree of public scrutiny into their decisions. However, this idea seems a little unacceptable because it is impossible to pin point exact standards set up by the rating system. Movies today touch a variety of topics and issues. It is impossible to set up any method up for the public because it might not apply to each movie. Thus, setting up a public forum would be problematic because every individuals ideas vary and this could be chaotic and unhelpful. The rating system is criticized for its inability to present an equal treatment to the individual-handed studios. This criticism lies on the belief that independent studios are not meted out with the same ratings as those apt(p) to major studios. Thus, independent studi os are given a harsher rating system which is a great reverse gear in the creation of new and diverse films. An instance of this is evident in the rating given to the movie Saints and Soldiers. The movie was created by an independent studio and created a limited amount of sex, profanity and violence. Yet, a single scene where a character is killed made the movie get a PG-13 rating (Deseret News). This is an obvious target of bias against independent studios which can be of great harm to the creativity and emergence of unique ideas in the motion picture industry.Thus