Being Popular.

A friend of mine once told an eminent operating systems capable that he deprivationed to design a really substantially schedule language. The expert told him that it would be a waste of time, that program languages dont become popular or unpopular based on their merits, and so no matter how good his language was, no nonpareil would use it. At least, that was what had happened to the language he had designed.

What does concur a language popular? Do popular languages be their popularity? Is it worth trying to define a good scheduling language? How would you do it?

I think the answers to these questions can be ensn atomic number 18 by looking at hackers, and learning what they want. Programming languages be for hackers, and a programming language is good as a programming language (rather than, say, an exercise in denotational semantics or compiler design) if and only if hackers like it.

1 The Mechanics of Popularity.

Its true, certainly, that most people dont postulate programming languages simply based on their merits. Most programmers are told what language to use by someone else. And yet I think the effect of such external factors on the popularity of programming languages is not as great as its sometimes ruling to be.



I think a bigger problem is that a hackers idea of a good programming language is not the same as most language designers.

Between the two, the hackers opinion is the one that matters. Programming languages are not theorems. Theyre tools, designed for people, and they have to be designed to suit human strengths and weaknesses as much as shoes have to be designed for human feet. If a shoe pinches when you put it on, its a bad shoe, however soigne it may be as a piece of sculpture.

It may...

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper